Renting is Cheaper than Buying - But is it Financially Better?
A recent study into the cost of renting verses the cost of a mortgage
over a repayment period of twenty-five years has shown that in some
areas of the country, it actually works out cheaper to be a tenant
than it does to be on the property ladder.
The areas in which it was found to be cheaper to rent were Wales,
the North, East Anglia, London and the South West.
The savings that can be made, with the study based upon average
prices and a twenty-five year repayment period with interest rates
of 5.5%, are large in many cases – the highest savings seen
in Wales, some £27,416 over the full period. The South West
wasn’t far off this figure at £21k of savings when compared
to the mortgage costs.
Five of the twelve regions showed that on average people renting
would be better off financially than those with mortgages, but what
the figure do not show is that those buying a home will own that
equity at the end of the 25 year period, whereas those renting will
have nothing to show for the money that they have paid out.
When you do take this into account, the person who opted to buy
will have ownership of a house worth in excess of £180,000
whereas the renter will have at most paid out £27,000 less
during the period of time that it took the buyer to repay the mortgage.
When all this is considered, the person who opted to buy rather
than rent ends up over £150,000 better off – and this
is when you consider the current best-case scenario for the person
renting.
Weighing up whether to rent or to buy comes down in most cases
to personal preference, rental is cheaper initially but in the long
run doesn’t give anything in return, whilst buying is costly
at the start but will end with the ownership of the home.
|